DeShazo v. Rees
DeShazo v. Rees
600 So. 2d 607; 1992 La. LEXIS 1981; 1992 WL 142984
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
DeShazo v. Rees
Opinion of the Court
In re Rees, Danny; State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins.; — Defendant(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, supervisory and/or remedial; Parish of Jefferson, Twenty-Fourth Judicial District Court, Div. “F”, No. 395-328; Civil District Court, Div. “I”, No. 89-26336; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 92-CW-0141.
Denied.
Concurring Opinion
concurs. While I am inclined to remand and order the trial court to rule on the prescription issue, the case has now been transferred to the district court in the parish where the first action was filed, and that court should rule on the prescription issue promptly.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.