State v. Honore
State v. Honore
602 So. 2d 10; 1992 La. LEXIS 2476; 1992 WL 198158
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
State v. Honore
Opinion of the Court
In re Honoré, Joseph a/k/a; Diggs, Maurice; — Defendant(s); applying for supervi
The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for Boykin and sentencing transcripts he has filed on or about September 26, 1991. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.