Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1992

State v. Constance

State v. Constance
Supreme Court of Louisiana · Decided September 2, 1992
605 So. 2d 1074; 1992 La. LEXIS 2554; 1992 WL 218193 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

State v. Constance

Opinion of the Court

In re Constance, Robert; — Defendants); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “E”, No. 261-779.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for production of documents he has filed on or about June 21, 1992. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.