Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1993

State ex rel. Clark v. State

State ex rel. Clark v. State
Supreme Court of Louisiana · Decided January 20, 1993 · Kimball
610 So. 2d 824; 1993 La. LEXIS 142; 1993 WL 13763 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

State ex rel. Clark v. State

Opinion of the Court

In re Clark, Albert Chur; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “D”, No. 247-571.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion to correct an illegal sentence he has filed on or about October 3, 1992. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court.

KIMBALL, J., not on panel.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.