State ex rel. Cranson v. Tuck
State ex rel. Cranson v. Tuck
619 So. 2d 553; 1993 La. LEXIS 1928; 1993 WL 218924
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
State ex rel. Cranson v. Tuck
Opinion of the Court
In re Cranson, Juan Reginald; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Vernon, 30th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 26,649.
The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion to correct an illegal sentence he has filed on or about May 5, 1992. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s assertion that he has filed his motion with district court is incorrect, the
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.