In re State District Court Judge XYZ
In re State District Court Judge XYZ
627 So. 2d 641; 1993 La. LEXIS 3225; 1993 WL 468132
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
In re State District Court Judge XYZ
Opinion of the Court
In re District Court Judge XYZ; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs.
Denied.
Concurring Opinion
concurs in the denial but notes his opinion that this is a very close matter and that the Judiciary Commission should exercise care because of its vast power.
Concurring Opinion
concurs. The motion to quash subpoena duces tecum should first be filed in the Judiciary Commission. However, the showing made does not warrant quashing the subpoena. Thus, I concur in the denial of the motion to quash, but I would grant the motion to keep the filing confidential in this matter pending before the Commission.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.