In re State District Court Judge XYZ

Supreme Court of Louisiana November 10, 1993

In re State District Court Judge XYZ, 627 So. 2d 641 (La. 1993)

1993 La. LEXIS 3225; 1993 WL 468132

Dennis, Hall, Ortique, Watson

Opinion of the Court

In re District Court Judge XYZ; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs.

Denied.

Concurring Opinion

WATSON, J.,

concurs in the denial but notes his opinion that this is a very close matter and that the Judiciary Commission should exercise care because of its vast power.

Concurring Opinion

HALL, J.,

concurs. The motion to quash subpoena duces tecum should first be filed in the Judiciary Commission. However, the showing made does not warrant quashing the subpoena. Thus, I concur in the denial of the motion to quash, but I would grant the motion to keep the filing confidential in this matter pending before the Commission.

ORTIQUE, J., joins in the concurrence by HALL, J. DENNIS, J., not on panel.

Reference

Full Case Name: In re STATE DISTRICT COURT JUDGE XYZ
Status: Published