Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1995

State ex rel. Anderson v. Clerk of Court

State ex rel. Anderson v. Clerk of Court
Supreme Court of Louisiana · Decided January 6, 1995 · Lemmon
648 So. 2d 909; 1995 La. LEXIS 70; 1995 WL 6270 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
State ex rel. Anderson v. Clerk of Court

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

In re Anderson, Rudolph; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans Criminal District Court Div. “B” No. 303 — 669; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 94KW-0429.

Granted. The district court is ordered to provide relator with a copy of the charging document in his case. Although as a general matter incarcerated indigents must demonstrate a particularized need for a court document before receiving a copy of it free of charge, see, e.g., Stewart v. Lombard, 94-0040 (La. 6/3/94), 637 So.2d 496; cf. United States v. MacCollum, 426 U.S. 317, 325, 96 S.Ct. 2086, 2091, 48 L.Ed.2d 666 (1976); State ex rel. Nash v. State, 604 So.2d 1054 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1992); LSA — R.S. 44:32(C)(l)(a), the bill of information or grand jury indictment charging them with committing a crime form an exception to that rule. La.C.Cr.P. art. 498; see, e.g., State ex rel. Foret v. State, 617 So.2d 900 (La. 1993); State v. Martin, 516 So.2d 124 (La. 1987). As to the other documents he requests, relator’s application is denied. He has not demonstrated the required particularized need. *910See MacCollum, 426 U.S. at 329, 96 S.Ct. at 2093 (Blaekmun, J., concurring).

LEMMON, J., not on panel.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.