Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1996

State ex rel. Harris v. State

State ex rel. Harris v. State
Supreme Court of Louisiana · Decided February 16, 1996
667 So. 2d 1042; 1996 La. LEXIS 494; 1996 WL 71151 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
State ex rel. Harris v. State

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

In re Harris, Nobie; — Plaintiff/s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial 'Writ; Parish of Ouachita, 4th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 40,368.

Writ granted in part. Where “there is a discrepancy between the minutes and the transcript, the transcript must prevail.” State v. Lynch, 441 So.2d 732, 734 (La. 1983); see also State v. Godejohn, 425 So.2d 750, 751 n. (“boilerplate type minutes of court” lack reliability and must yield to transcript). The district court is therefore ordered to resen-tence relator in compliance with State v. Harris, 93-1098 (La. 1/5/96), 665 So.2d 1164. In all other respects, the application is denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.