State v. Bright

Supreme Court of Louisiana
State v. Bright, 684 So. 2d 954 (La. 1996)
1996 La. LEXIS 3676; 1996 WL 755173
Appeal, Application, Art, Calogero, Const, Entertain, Grant, Had, Has, Imposed, Lemmon, Marcus, Next, Penalty, Remand, Stay

State v. Bright

Opinion of the Court

In re Bright, Dan; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “F”, No. 376-994.

Denied.

CALOGERO, C.J., would grant the stay and entertain the application at the next conference. MARCUS, J., would grant and remand to the court of appeal. This Court had no appellate jurisdiction since a penalty of death has not been actually imposed. La. Const, art. V, Section 5(D). LEMMON, J., not on panel.

Reference

Full Case Name
STATE of Louisiana v. Dan BRIGHT
Status
Published