Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1997

State ex rel. Bright v. State

State ex rel. Bright v. State
Supreme Court of Louisiana · Decided October 31, 1997
701 So. 2d 1322; 1997 La. LEXIS 3528; 1997 WL 707045 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
State ex rel. Bright v. State

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM. *

Writ granted. The district court judge who denied relator’s petition for post-conviction relief prosecuted relator for the instant crime over twenty years ago. Although this appears to have been inadvertent, he should have been recused from the post-conviction relief proceeding. La.Code Crim.P. art. 671(A)(3). Therefore, the trial court’s ruling *1323on the relator’s application for post-eonvietion relief is vacated. This case is remanded to the district court for reassignment to another judge to rule on relator’s application for post-conviction relief.

Kimball, J., not on panel. Rule IV, Part 2, § 3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.