State v. Narcisse
Cases that cite this one
64 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- State of Louisiana v. Margaret Ann Howard (La. Ct. App. 2011)
- State v. Tate (La. Ct. App. 2010)
- State v. Nolen (La. Ct. App. 2009)
- State v. Colton (La. Ct. App. 2007)
- State of Louisiana v. Michael W. Colton (La. Ct. App. 2007)
- State v. Hood (La. Ct. App. 2006)
- State v. Buckley (La. Ct. App. 2003)
- State v. Callegari (La. Ct. App. 2000)
- State v. Gregrich (La. Ct. App. 1999)
- State of Louisiana v. Exzavian Burnette (La. Ct. App. 2024)
- State of Louisiana v. Larry J. Cooper, Jr. (La. Ct. App. 2024)
- State of Louisiana v. Kendarius Dewayne Sewell A/K/A Kendarius Sewell (La. Ct. App. 2023)
- State of Louisiana v. James Sanford Snider (La. Ct. App. 2023)
- State of Louisiana v. David Paul Monceaux (La. Ct. App. 2022)
- State of Louisiana v. Damon Broussard (La. Ct. App. 2022)
- State of Louisiana v. Phillip Jarratt (La. Ct. App. 2020)
- State of Louisiana v. Dalton Bryce Lowe (La. Ct. App. 2020)
- State of Louisiana v. Randall Paul Burton (La. Ct. App. 2019)
- State v. Drummer (La. Ct. App. 2018)
- State of Louisiana v. John Drummer, Jr. (La. Ct. App. 2018)
- State of Louisiana v. James Toups (La. Ct. App. 2017)
- State v. Fallon (La. Ct. App. 2016)
- State of Louisiana v. Stephon Enrique Fallon (La. Ct. App. 2016)
- State v. Chandler (La. Ct. App. 2010)
- State v. Armstrong (La. Ct. App. 2010)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
STATE of Louisiana
v.
Raymond NARCISSE.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
*699 PER CURIAM.[*]
Granted. Relator's sentence is vacated and this case is remanded to the district court for resentencing.
A trial court may not require restitution to the victim "unless the imposition or execution of sentencing is suspended." State v. Clark, 93-1470 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1994), 643 So.2d 463, 467, writ denied, 94-2715 (La.2/9/95), 649 So.2d 418; State v. Matthews, 572 So.2d 250, 254 (La.App. 1 Cir. 1990), writ denied, 575 So.2d 387 (La. 1991). In addition, a trial judge lacks authority under La.R.S. 15:573.1(C) to deny a defendant eligibility for good time credits against his sentence, because that statute is "directed to the Department of Corrections exclusively." State ex rel. Simmons v. Stalder, 93-1852 (La.1/26/96), 666 So.2d 661. Moreover, even the Department of Corrections lacks that authority under La.R.S. 15:571.3(C) in a case in which the trial court has not formally adjudicated and sentenced the defendant as a multiple offender under the provisions of La. R.S. 15:529.1. When the sentencing court is of the opinion that a denial of diminution of sentence is warranted under the specific circumstances of the case, the trial judge's discretion should be exercised under La.C.Cr.P. 890.1(B).
NOTES
[*] Victory, J., not on panel. Rule IV, part 2, § 3.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.