Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1999

State ex rel. Aleman v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana · Decided October 1, 1999 · Deny, Kimball, Knoll, Traylor, Writ

745 So. 2d 601; 1999 La. LEXIS 2383; 1999 WL 799208 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

State ex rel. Iburg v. State (La. 2013)
State v. Aleman (La. Ct. App. 2002)
State v. Smith (La. 2001)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM. *

Writ granted. The district court is ordered to appoint counsel and hold a hear*602ing at which it will allow relator to withdraw his guilty pleas if he persists in that desire. The record below supports relator’s claim, corroborated by his attorney, that misinformation with regard to his eligibility for good time credits against his sentences precluded him from making his decision to waive trial and enter his pleas “with eyes open.” Adams v. United States ex rel. McCann, 317 U.S. 269, 279, 63 S.Ct. 236, 242, 87 L.Ed. 268 (1942). State ex rel. Brown v. State, 93-1071 (La.3/8/96), 668 So.2d 1148; State v. Scott, 93-0401 (La.3/17/95), 651 So.2d 1344.

KIMBALL, TRAYLOR, and KNOLL, JJ., would deny the writ.

Marcus, J., not on panel. See La. S.Ct. Rule IV, Part II, § 3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.