Chittenden v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- In re Maxwell (La. 2001)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
George CHITTENDEN and Roberta Kay Chittenden
v.
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Granted. Application granted on the issue of whether the attorney may recover interest on advances of funds to the client and, if so, the extent of recovery under the circumstances of this case. Otherwise, the application is denied.[1]
KIMBALL, J., not on panel.
NOTES
[1] A committee is to be appointed to study the revision of Rule 1.8(e) of the Rules of Professional Conduct, regarding financial assistance to a client.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.