Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp.
Cases that cite this one
81 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Ford of Slidell, LLC v. Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company (United States District Court Eastern District of Louisiana 2021)
- Apollo Energy, LLC v. Lloyd'S (District Court, M.D. Louisiana 2019)
- Martco Ltd. Partnership v. Wellons, Inc. (5th Cir. 2009)
- Martco Ltd Prtnshp v. Wellons Inc (5th Cir. 2009)
- Laurie B. Hebert, Individually and Kevin Hebert, Individually and on behalf of his minor son, Robert Seth Hebert v. Louisiana State University System Board of Supervisors through Louisiana State University and Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut (La. Ct. App. 2023)
- St. Tammany Parish Hospital Service District No. 2 v. Zurich American Insurance Company (United States District Court Eastern District of Louisiana 2022)
- Campo v. United States (United States Court of Federal Claims 2021)
- Campo v. United States (United States Court of Federal Claims 2021)
- Ticknor v. Rouse's Enterprises, LLC (United States District Court Eastern District of Louisiana 2014)
- In re Fema Trailer Formaldehyde Products Liability Litigation (United States District Court Eastern District of Louisiana 2011)
- Kline v. FARM BUREAU INSURANCE COMPANIES (La. Ct. App. 2006)
- Lemoine v. Illinois National Insurance Co. (La. Ct. App. 2004)
- Allstate Insurance v. Barron (Conn. 2004)
- Richardson v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance (D.C. 2003)
- Eustis Mortgage Corporation v. American Zurich Insurance Company (United States District Court Eastern District of Louisiana 2025)
- 225 Baronne Complex, LLC v. Roy Anderson Corp. and the Honorable Chelsey R. Napoleon, in Her Capacity as the Recorder of Mortgages for Orleans Parish (La. Ct. App. 2025)
- Simmons v. G E I C O Insurance Co (District Court, W.D. Louisiana 2025)
- Law Industries, LLC v. State of Louisiana, Department of Education, Recovery School District and Advanced Environmental Consulting, Inc. (La. 2024)
- Hospital Service District No. 1 of Terrebonne Parish v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company (United States District Court Eastern District of Louisiana 2024)
- Hargiss v. Princeton Excess & Surplus Lines Insurance Co (District Court, W.D. Louisiana 2024)
- Hargiss v. Princeton Excess & Surplus Lines Insurance Co (District Court, W.D. Louisiana 2024)
- Bryan Thayer Versus Andrew Nierman and Amica Mutual Insurance Company (La. Ct. App. 2024)
- Nautilus Insurance Co v. Cavazos (District Court, W.D. Louisiana 2024)
- Morris v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co (District Court, W.D. Louisiana 2024)
- Gruver v. Allstate Insurance (5th Cir. 2024)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Phyllis Kay Roby DOERR, et al.
v.
MOBIL OIL CORPORATION, et al.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
For majority opinion of the court, see 774 So.2d 119.
ON REHEARING
PER CURIAM.
Rehearing granted for the sole purposes of correcting a misstatement of fact and clarifying the decree which are the only issues raised by the rehearing applicant, Genesis Insurance Company.
First, on the consent of all the parties, the sentence at the top of page 3: "This exclusion was not part of the original policy, but was adopted and placed in the policy on February 27, 1996." is changed to read as follows: "This exclusion was part *574 of the original policy, but was not countersigned by the parties until February 27, 1996." This change does not affect the reasoning or holding of the original opinion.
Second, in this case, only St. Bernard Parish sought review by this court of the judgement of the court of appeal that dismissed the principal demand against Genesis by the plaintiffs and the cross-claim by the Parish. "[W]here certiorari is granted on the application of one party to a suit, the judgment (decree) cannot be amended or changed to the benefit of other parties who have failed to apply for such review." Jordan v. Travelers Ins. Co., 257 La. 995, 1001, 245 So.2d 151, 153 (1971) (collecting authorities). Thus, the decree is revised to read as follows: "For the foregoing reasons, the decision of the court of appeal dismissing St. Bernard Parish's cross claim against Genesis Insurance Company is reversed, and the district court's ruling denying Genesis's Motion for Summary Judgment against the Parish is reinstated. The case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion."
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.