Williams v. Rubicon, Inc.
Cases that cite this one
6 later published cases cite this decision.
- Iles v. Ogden (La. Ct. App. 2010)
- Thongsavanh v. Schexnayder (La. Ct. App. 2010)
- Jenkins v. STATE EX REL. DOTD (La. Ct. App. 2008)
- Jenkins v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development (La. Ct. App. 2008)
- Edwards v. Daugherty (La. 2004)
- Edwards v. Daugherty (La. Ct. App. 2003)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Joseph WILLIAMS
v.
RUBICON, INC. and Len Sanford.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Maria N. Alessandra, Larry E. Demmons, New Orleans, Harry A. Johnson, III, Alan J. Robert, Phelps Dunbar, L.L.P., Gonzales, for applicant.
Robert B. Macmurdo, Victor L. Marcello, Talbot, Carmouche & Marcello, Gonzales, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
Upon defendant's application, we granted certiorari in this case. Williams v. Rubicon, Inc., 02-0802 (La.6/7/02), 818 So.2d 766. After hearing oral arguments and reviewing the record of the matter, we conclude that the judgment below does not require the exercise of our supervisory authority. Accordingly, we recall our order of June 7, 2002 as improvidently granted, and deny plaintiff's application.
ON REHEARING
PER CURIAM.
Rehearing is granted for the sole purpose of clarifying this court's original decree. The decree of December 4, 2002 in this matter is hereby amended to read as follows:
Upon defendant's application, we granted certiorari in this case. Williams v. Rubicon, Inc., 02-0802 (La.6/7/02), 818 So.2d 766. After hearing oral arguments and reviewing the record of the matter, we conclude that the judgment below does not require the exercise of our supervisory authority. Accordingly, we recall our order of June 7, 2002 as improvidently granted, and deny defendant's application.
In all other respects, rehearing is denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.