Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2003

State ex rel. Batiste v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana · Decided June 6, 2003 · Calogero, Knoll, Weimer

845 So. 2d 1080; 2003 La. LEXIS 1845; 2003 WL 21349465 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Dissenting Opinion

KNOLL, J.,

would grant and order a remand to the district court for the purpose of conducting a hearing to determine why the December 9, 1996, transcript of the guilty plea colloquy requested by relator and ordered by the district court to be provided to relator does not exist.

Dissenting Opinion

CALOGERO, C.J.,

would grant and order a remand to the district court for the purpose of conducting a hearing to determine why the December 9,1996, transcript of the guilty plea colloquy requested by relator and ordered by the district court to be provided to relator does not exist.

Dissenting Opinion

WEIMER, J.,

would grant and order a remand to the district court for the purpose of conducting a hearing to determine why the December 9, 1996, transcript of the guilty plea colloquy requested by rela*1081tor and ordered by the district court to be provided to relator does not exist.

Opinion of the Court

In re Batiste, George; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. James, 23rd Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 2601; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 02-KH-06.

Denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.