In re Lain
In re Lain
860 So. 2d 531; 2003 La. LEXIS 3238; 2003 WL 22682722
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
In re Lain
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Treating respondent’s September 22, 2003 correspondence as a motion by respondent seeking to practice law during the pendency of her reinstatement proceeding,
IT IS ORDERED that the motion be and hereby is denied. There is no procedure in Supreme Court Rule XIX permitting a suspended attorney to practice law prior to a determination that the criteria for reinstatement set forth in Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 24 have been satisfied,
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.