Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2003

State v. Guidry

Supreme Court of Louisiana · Decided November 21, 2003

862 So. 2d 965; 2003 La. LEXIS 3346; 2003 WL 22739623 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

State v. Julien (La. Ct. App. 2017)
State v. Newsom (La. Ct. App. 2017)
State of Louisiana v. David Ray Newsom (La. Ct. App. 2017)
State v. Young (La. Ct. App. 2014)
State v. Guidry (La. Ct. App. 2004)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Granted. This case is remanded to the court of appeal for reconsideration and written treatment in light of United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 104 S.Ct. 3405, 82 L.Ed.2d 677 (1984). See United States v. Richardson, 943 F.2d 547, 550 (5th Cir. 1991); United States v. Turner, 926 F.2d 883, 886 (9th Cir. 1991); United States v. Rome, 809 F.2d 665, 669-70 (10th Cir. 1987). See also State v. Matthieu, 506 So.2d 1209, 1212 (La. 1987) (“‘La.C.Cr.P. Art. 703 permits suppression only of evi*966dence obtained “by an unconstitutional search or seizure.” It was not intended to permit suppression of evidence seized by a warrant ‘illegal’ merely because technically contrary to law, unless the seizure is viola-tive of fundamental due process concepts.’ ’’(quoting State v. Bienvenu, 260 La. 1023, n. 1, 258 So.2d 72, 74 (1972)).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.