State v. Sanders
Cases that cite this one
52 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- State v. Roberts (La. Ct. App. 2007)
- State of Louisiana v. Paul Roberts, Jr. (La. Ct. App. 2007)
- State of Louisiana v. Jermaine Brisco (La. Ct. App. 2026)
- State of Louisiana v. Navarri R. Henderson (La. Ct. App. 2025)
- State of Louisiana Versus Kevin Johnson (La. Ct. App. 2024)
- State of Louisiana Versus Raymond H Kimble III (La. Ct. App. 2024)
- State of Louisiana Versus Alexsy Mejia (La. Ct. App. 2023)
- State of Louisiana Versus Brennan A. Harris (La. Ct. App. 2023)
- Rudolph Perkins Versus State of Louisiana (La. Ct. App. 2022)
- State of Louisiana Versus Kaylan Morris (La. Ct. App. 2022)
- State of Louisiana v. Joseph Michael Elie, III (La. Ct. App. 2021)
- State of Louisiana Versus Dewayne A. Allen (La. Ct. App. 2020)
- State of Louisiana Versus Tory N. Clark (La. Ct. App. 2020)
- State of Louisiana Versus Corey Bannister (La. Ct. App. 2019)
- State v. Brown (La. Ct. App. 2018)
- State v. Dixon (La. Ct. App. 2018)
- State v. Ayala (La. Ct. App. 2018)
- State v. Hankton (La. Ct. App. 2018)
- State v. Taylor (La. Ct. App. 2018)
- State v. Thompson (La. Ct. App. 2018)
- State v. Shelby (La. Ct. App. 2018)
- State v. Shelby (La. Ct. App. 2018)
- State of Louisiana v. Jose Isreal Ayala, III (La. Ct. App. 2018)
- State v. Payne (La. Ct. App. 2017)
- State v. Payne (La. Ct. App. 2017)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
STATE of Louisiana
v.
Edith SANDERS.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
PER CURIAM.
Granted. The defendant's sentence of 15 years imprisonment at hard labor without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence is amended to provide that the defendant shall serve a term of 15 years imprisonment at hard labor without benefit of probation or suspension of sentence, and without benefit of parole for a period of five years. See La.R.S. 40:967(B)(4)(b) (1997 La. Acts 1284); La.R.S. 15:529.1(G). In cases in which the sentencing error made by the trial court does not involve the omission of a restrictive term specified by the legislature as part of the sentence but the imposition of limits beyond what the legislature has authorized in the sentencing statute(s), an appellate court should not rely on La.R.S. 15:301.1(A) to correct the error as a matter of law but should correct the sentence on its own authority under La.C.Cr.P. art. 882 to correct an illegal sentence "at any time".
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.