State v. Holliday
State v. Holliday
Concurring Opinion
concurring in part; dissenting in part. After the trial court denied a state motion for continuance, the State entered a nolle prosequi. The State effectively subverted the trial court’s denial of the continuance when, three days later, the State filed a second bill of information charging the defendant with the same two counts the State dismissed pursuant to the nolle prosequi. I would grant to review this procedure. See State v. Love, 00-3347, pp. 1-5 (La.5/23/03), 847 So.2d 1198, 1213-1216.
Opinion of the Court
In re Holliday, Vyshaun; — Defendant; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District
Denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.