In re Bleichner
In re Bleichner
879 So. 2d 112; 2004 La. LEXIS 1662; 2004 WL 1096803
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Dean v. Southmark Const. (La. 2004)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
concurs.
I concur in the majority’s decision to deny the petition, because my contrary opinion expressed in dissent in In re: Bourke, 02-1468 (La.6/14/02), 819 So.2d 1020, citing to In re: Appert, 444 So.2d 1208 (La. 1984), and In re: Application of Respondek, 442 So.2d 435 (La. 1983), has not borne fruit, and today’s decision follows the recently decided cases on this issue.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.