Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2009

In Re Wiedemann

In Re Wiedemann
Supreme Court of Louisiana · Decided April 24, 2009 · Per Curiam
7 So. 3d 1162; 2009 La. LEXIS 242; 2009 WL 1099982 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

In Re Wiedemann

Opinion

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent attempted to practice law in Mississippi, contrary to the regulations of that jurisdiction. Following the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Karl Wiedemann, Louisiana Bar Roll number 18502, be publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall enroll in and attend one full day of Ethics School offered by the Louisiana State Bar Association’s Practice Assistance and Improvement Committee.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.