ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

|/The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent failed to adequately supervise his nonlawyer staff and failed to properly charge clients for certain expenses. Prior to the institution of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline, in which the parties stipulated that respondent has violated Rules 1.8(e)(3), 1.15(a), and 5.3(b) of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Donald R. Brown, Louisiana Bar Roll number 3550, be suspended from the prac *968 tice of law for a period of one year and one day. This suspension shall be deferred in its entirety, subject to respondent’s successful completion of a two-year period of supervised probation governed by the terms and conditions set forth in the Petition for Consent Discipline. The probationary period shall commence from the date respondent, the ODC, and the probation monitor execute a formal probation plan. Any failure of respondent to comply with the conditions of probation, or any misconduct during the probationary period, may be grounds for making the deferred suspension executory, or imposing additional discipline, as appropriate.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, 12with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.