Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2010

State v. Blackman

State v. Blackman
Supreme Court of Louisiana · Decided July 2, 2010
39 So. 3d 585; 2010 La. LEXIS 1697; 2010 WL 2735607 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

State v. Blackman

Opinion of the Court

In re State of Louisiana; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. A, No. 493-991.

Writ granted. A defendant has no right to an unredacted police report containing witnesses’ identifying information unless he demonstrates a “distinctive reason why fundamental fairness dictates discovery of the names of these witnesses.” State v. Weathersby, 09-2407 (La.3/12/10) 29 So.3d 499, 501. No such showing has been made. In light of the State’s concerns regarding witness safety, and the absence of any peculiar circumstances requiring disclosure, we find that the witness identifying information should remain confidential. The judgments of the lower courts are reversed, vacated, and set aside, and the matter is remanded to the district court for further proceedings.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.