In re Handley, Reginald Ray; — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. G, No. 06-73-5034; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2011 KW 0744.

b Granted in part; otherwise denied. The district court did not err in denying the motion to correct an illegal sentence and to resentence relator. However, the Department of Corrections is directed to provide relator with a parole eligibility date pursuant to the criteria in La. R.S. 15:574.4(A)(2), without regard to commutation of sentence by the Governer. See State v. Shaffer, 11-1756 (La. 11/23/11), 77 So.3d 939 (applying Graham, v. Florida, 560 U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010)).

dissents and assigns reasons.

|TOn November 8, 1983, the Defendant, Reginald Handley, (relator herein) was tried by a jury, and convicted of aggravated rape, which he committed when he was 16 years old. He was sentenced to a term of life imprisonment, without parole.

The United States Supreme Court’s historic decision in Graham v. Florida, 560 *1010U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010) held that “for a juvenile offender who did not commit homicide, the Eighth Amendment forbids the sentence of life without parole.” Graham, 560 U.S. at -, 130 S.Ct. at 2030. Prior to Graham, the United States was the only nation in the world still adhering to. the practice of sentencing juvenile offenders to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole for non-homicide offenses.1 In the United States, only a handful of jurisdictions still impose life sentences without parole on juvenile offenders. Louisiana is one of eleven states wherein juveniles are currently serving life sentences, without parole, for non-homicide offenses.2 When Graham was decided, there were 129 juveniles in the United States serving life sentences, without parole, for non-homicide offenses. Of those, seventy-seven juveniles were serving sentences imposed in Florida. Of the | remaining 53, who were imprisoned in just ten states, 17 were serving life sentences imposed in Louisiana for non-homicide offenses.3

Graham makes clear that the ad hoc exercise of the executive’s power of commutation does not afford juveniles sufficient protection, and such inmates have nowhere else to go for relief other than the judiciary. There is no way to calculate a parole eligibility date for a life sentence. To satisfy the dictates of Graham, I would remand this case to the district court, and order that relator be re-sentenced to a fixed term of years, which can be used as the basis for calculating the eligibility date for parole.