In re Liptak
In re Liptak
124 So. 3d 1106; 2013 WL 6017506; 2013 La. LEXIS 2561
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
In re Liptak
Opinion of the Court
In re Disciplinary Counsel; — Other; Applying For Findings and Recommendations (Reinstatement) Office of Disciplinary Board, No. ll-DB-103.
Petition for reinstatement denied. Petitioner may not reapply for reinstatement until he has' fully complied with all conditions set forth in Supreme Court Rule XIX, Section 24, including, but not limited to, the requirement that he demonstrate one year of sobriety, and in no event less than one year from the date of this judgment. Supreme Court Rule XIX, Section 24(1).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.