Hemstad v. Dakin
Hemstad v. Dakin
Opinion of the Court
In re M. Christakis Co., L.L.C.; — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 717-114 C/W 715-260; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 15-C-267.
| denied.
Concurring Opinion
additionally concurring.
hi concur in the denial of the writ. Defendants have an adequate remedy-on appeal, when the appellate courts will have fully developed record to review.
Concurring Opinion
additionally concurs and assigns reasons.
[ t While I agree that there are genuine issues of material fact, in my view, this is a very close case. In the event of an adverse judgment at trial, defendants will have an adequate remedy on appeal, at
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.