Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2016

In re Perrin

In re Perrin
Supreme Court of Louisiana · Decided January 8, 2016
182 So. 3d 942; 2016 La. LEXIS 22; 2016 WL 228157 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

In re Perrin

Opinion of the Court

• ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

PER CURIAM.

hThe Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent notarized documents outside the presence of the signatories. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Warren A. Perrin, Louisiana Bar Roll number 10498, be and he hereby is publicly reprimanded. -

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.