Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law

In re Confidential Party

Supreme Court of Louisiana
In re Confidential Party, 184 So. 3d 1270 (La. 2016)
2016 La. LEXIS 359; 2016 WL 783066
Clark, Discipline, Knoll, Louisiana, Reject, Supreme, Weimer

In re Confidential Party

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

[ Considering the Joint Petition for Consent Discipline filed by respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel,

IT IS ORDERED that the Joint Petition for Consent Discipline be and hereby is rejected pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 20. '

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter be remanded for consideration of the previously filed formal charges.

NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA, this 26th day of February, 2016.

*1271FOR THE-COURT:

/s/ John L. Weimer /s/ Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana KNOLL, J., would conditionally reject ■ the consént discipline. CLARK, J., would conditionally reject the consent discipline.

Dissenting Opinion

KNOLL, J.,

dissents.

|J would conditionally reject the consent discipline.

Dissenting Opinion

CLARK, J.

hi would conditionally reject the consent discipline.

Reference

Full Case Name
In re CONFIDENTIAL PARTY
Status
Published
↑