State v. Durr

Supreme Court of Louisiana
State v. Durr, 202 So. 3d 996 (La. 2016)
2016 La. LEXIS 2146
Clark, Crichton, Deny, Knoll, Reasons

State v. Durr

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

11Writ granted. The District Court erred when it rejected the Commissioner’s Recommendation that it order DNA testing conducted in relator’s case. See, e.g., State v. Debrow, 13-1814 (La. 5/23/14), 138 So.3d 1229; State ex rel. Ford v. State, 12-1860 (La. 2/8/13), 107 So.3d 640; State ex rel. Tran v. State, 12-1275 (La. 10/8/12), 99 So.3d 1005; State ex rel. Jackson v. State, 11-0394 (La. 5/25/12), 90 So.3d 384; State v. Stokes, 10-1387 (La. 2/11/11), 56 So.3d 1008.

KNOLL, J., would deny. CLARK, J., dissents and assigns reasons. CRICHTON, J., would deny.

|, KNOLL, J., would deny.

Dissenting Opinion

Clark, J.,

dissents.

hi respectfully dissent and would deny relator’s writ application.

h Crichton, J., would deny.

Reference

Full Case Name
STATE of Louisiana v. Richard DURR
Status
Published