State v. Durr
State v. Durr
202 So. 3d 996; 2016 La. LEXIS 2146
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
State v. Durr
Opinion of the Court
11Writ granted. The District Court erred when it rejected the Commissioner’s Recommendation that it order DNA testing conducted in relator’s case. See, e.g., State v. Debrow, 13-1814 (La. 5/23/14), 138 So.3d 1229; State ex rel. Ford v. State, 12-1860 (La. 2/8/13), 107 So.3d 640; State ex rel. Tran v. State, 12-1275 (La. 10/8/12), 99 So.3d 1005; State ex rel. Jackson v. State, 11-0394 (La. 5/25/12), 90 So.3d 384; State v. Stokes, 10-1387 (La. 2/11/11), 56 So.3d 1008.
|, KNOLL, J., would deny.
Dissenting Opinion
dissents.
hi respectfully dissent and would deny relator’s writ application.
h Crichton, J., would deny.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.