Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2017

Hooper v. Louisiana Pigment Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana · Decided April 13, 2017

218 So. 3d 627; 2017 La. LEXIS 818 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

State in the Interest of M. J. D. Iii.; T. C. M. D.; K. R. D. (La. Ct. App. 2022)
Herman Lee Hooper v. Louisiana Pigment Company, Lp (La. Ct. App. 2020)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court Div. G, No. 2013-001665; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW16-00861

*628h Granted in part. The judgment of the trial court granting the motion in limine is reversed insofar as it excludes evidence of the plaintiffs applications for disability benefits. See Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp., 526 U.S. 795 (1999);

Smith v. Thurman Oils, Inc., 06-0743 (La.App. 1 Cir. 12/28/06), 951 So. 2d 359, writ denied, 07-0207 (La. 3/23/07), 951 So. 2d 1106. In all other respects, the writ is denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.