State v. Johnson
State v. Johnson
274 So. 3d 561
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
State v. Johnson
Concurring Opinion
Defendant argues he maintained his innocence and pointed his attorneys to two witnesses, Selena Collins and Montero Ursin, but they failed to investigate or interview these witnesses which forced defendant to accept a guilty plea. Selena Collins has now presented an affidavit indicating she was pressured to implicate the defendant.
Defendant's claims are better suited for post-conviction relief with a full evidentiary hearing.
Opinion of the Court
HUGHES, J., additionally concurs and assigns reasons.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.