Ashley Ford Sales, Inc. v. Royal Insurance Co. of America
Opinion of the Court
In this action the plaintiff seeks indemnification
The defendanf s position as set forth in its answer is that its obligation to pay arose only if the mortgagor fraudulently disposed of the collateral, and that in the present case the loss of the vehicle as collateral was a direct result of the seizure of it by law enforcement official agreeable to 21 U. S. C. §881.
The court found for the defendant.
We do not reach the merits of this appeal because nob riefs were filed by the parties. Failure to file abrief in accordance with Rule64 (f), Dist./Mun. Cts. R. Civ. P. precludes appellate review. Thoresen v. LeTendre, 1983 Mass. App. Div. 191, 193. Such failure constitutes a waiver of the right to appellate review. Sheridan v. Travelers Insurance Co., 57 Mass. App. Dec. 131 (1976); Soscia v. Soscia, 310 Mass. 418, 420 (1941).
The report is dismissed.
So ordered
There was also a count for an alleged violation of G.L.c. 93A
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.