Bertone v. Alperin
Opinion of the Court
The defendant appeals the denial of his motion to waive appeal bond in a summary process action entered in the Stoughton Division.
This case was tried pursuant to St. 1996, c. 358, “An Act Establishing A One Trial System in Norfolk & Middlesex Counties.” While the new one trial system
While arguably jurisdiction exists for an evidentiary hearing by the Appellate Division, we are of the opinion that a review based upon the record of the trial court’s denial of the bond is the customary and usual practice for making such determinations, limited to the issues of indigency and frivolousness as provided in G.L.c. 239, §5.
The record on appeal affords scant support for the appellant’s contention of indigency and non-frivolousness defense. Compare Tamber v. Desrochers, 45 Mass. App. Ct. 234 (1998). We can perceive no error of law nor abuse of discretion in the setting of the appeal bond.
The appeal is dismissed.
So ordered.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.