The Annie Leland
Opinion of the Court
The rule of court which was passed in the interest of all parties to salvage suits, that the value should be ascertained before the property is delivered, was not observed in this case; and though this happened through a misunderstanding, yet I remark upon it, that it may not occur again. In such a case, doubtful evidence will be construed most strongly against the owners, because they might have made the facts clear before executing their warrant to deliver.
In awarding the salvage in this ease, I find it to be one for a proportionately larger compensation than many others in which the value saved has been more considerable. The owners were in great danger of losing their whole property. It is true, this was largely the fault of the master; but as there is no pretence of any collusion between him and the libellants, they are entitled to say that they have saved the vessel in spite of his incompetency or bad faith, against his instructions, at a very critical time, and by the exercise of the qualities which he should have supplied, as well as of the ordinary skill, labor, and energy expected of persons in their situation.
There is some reason to suppose that the master and his brother were considerable owners in the vessel, and that the master at least was insured against a total los» only. Whether this was the true motive of his con
Decree accordingly.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- The ANNIE LELAND
- Status
- Published