Higgins v. City of Melrose

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Higgins v. City of Melrose

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

JOHN T. HIGGINS, ) Plaintiff, / V. Civil Action No. 18-12605-PBS CITY OF MELROSE, et al., Defendants. oO) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS [Docket No. 16] June 17, 2019 Boal, M.J. Defendant City of Melrose has moved to dismiss pro se plaintiff John T. Higgins’ complaint. Docket No. 16.! For the following reasons, this Court recommends that the District Judge assigned to this case grant the motion. I. FACTS? On December 20, 2018, Higgins filed his complaint, using a model form for pro se litigants. Docket No. 1. In the section asking him to identify the basis for jurisdiction, Higgins chose federal question. Id. at 3. In the section asking him to identify the applicable federal statutes, federal treaties, and/or provisions of the United States Constitution giving rise to the

On April 2, 2019, the District Court referred this case to the undersigned for full pretrial management, including report and recommendation on dispositive motions. Docket No. 18. 2 Because this case is before the Court on a motion to dismiss, the Court takes as true all well- pleaded allegations in the complaint and draws all reasonable inferences in Higgins’ favor. See Morales-Tajion v. P.R. Elec. Power Auth.,

524 F.3d 15, 17

(Ist Cir. 2008).

/ | 20AP (Tp ord

Reference

Status
Unknown