Oliver v. Sale
Oliver v. Sale
1 Super. Ct. Jud. 29
Oliver v. Sale
Opinion of the Court
The Evidence being clear that Sale had said he would not sell them as Slaves, and told Plaintiff to when they were fold, the Court directed the Jury to find Defendant Costs.
N. B. In Aggravation of Damages, had they found for the Plaintiff, Mr. Thacker said: “Oliver by selling these Boys for Slaves exposed himself to a Writ of Replevin,
Homine replegiando. Vid. F. N. B. 66. New Nat. B. 151, 152.
If this is returned non est invent., a Capias shall issue against the Defendant’s Goods and Effects.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.