Case of Williams
Case of Williams
Opinion of the Court
John Williams, having been returned a member from the town of Deerfield, at the May session, a committee was appointed to inquire into his political character and conduct, and to consider the propriety of his holding a seat.
By the report of the committee
The attorney general, being called upon for the purpose, appeared and stated, that he had not received any papers or evidence, to enable him to take measures for prosecuting Mr. Williams,
A motion was then made and seconded, that Mr. Williams should be excluded from, his seat, and after debate, the question was put and passed in the affirmative, 60 members out of 103 voting in favor of the motion.
A precept was issued to the town of Deerfield for a new election,
In the afternoon, the treasurer appeared and produced the bond alluded to, which having been read, it was made a question, whether the house will go into the consideration of the disqualifications of Mr. Williams as a representative ? which was determined in the negative. It was then voted, “that John Williams, returned as a representative from the town of Deerfield, at this sitting of the house, having been excluded this house in their last sitting, as a person incapable of being a representative for said town, in this general court, be excluded a seat, he, by the said former exclusion, being incapable of holding a seat in this house for this general court:” number of members present 114, yeas 78.
4 J. H. 149.
Same, 160.
Same.
The following is a copy of this resolve.
Resolve requesting the governor, with advice of council, to restrict John Williams, Seth Catlin, and Jonathan Ashley, in such a manner as the commonwealth may receive no injury.
Whereas it appears to this court, from the examination of John Williams, Seth. Catlin, and Jonathan Ashley, touching the instructions given the representatives of the town of Deerfield, and from the particular time at which these instructions were given, that there are just grounds of suspicion, that the said John Williams, Seth Catlin, and Jonathan Ashley, are unfriendly to the independence of the United States.
Therefore, Resolved, That the governor, with advice of council, he, and he hereby is, requested to lay the said John Williams, Seth Catlin, and Jonathan Ashley, under such restrictions, as that the commonwealth receive no injury from them or either of them.
See the “ Case of John Williams,” 1785—1786.
4 J. H. 164, 168.
4 J. H. 174.
Same, 177.
Same, 242,
Same, 243.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.