Rogers v. Goodwin
Cases that cite this one
36 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- City of Lynn v. Inhabitants of Nahant (Mass. 1873)
- Robert F. Almeder v. Town of Kennebunkport (Me. 2019)
- Tetra Tech EC, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue (Wis. 2018)
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. Hoffman (Ind. 1928)
- State ex rel. Michener v. Harrison (Ind. 1888)
- Robert F. Almeder v. Town of Kennebunkport (Me. 2019)
- Weeks v. Ruff, County Sup'r (S.C. 1932)
- Adams v. Hannah (Mass. 1929)
- Adams v. Hannah (Mass. 1927)
- Reade v. . Durham (N.C. 1917)
- In re Interrogatories of the Senate (Colo. 1913)
- Curless v. Watson (Ind. 1913)
- State v. Board of School Commissioners (Ala. 1913)
- Burrage v. County of Bristol (Mass. 1911)
- State ex rel. Clarke v. Carter (Ala. 1911)
- Mabardy v. McHugh (Mass. 1909)
- State ex rel. Gleason v. Gerdink (Ind. 1909)
- Smith v. Mayor of Worcester (Mass. 1902)
- State ex rel. Lewis v. Smith (Ind. 1902)
- Questions Submitted by the House of Representatives, March 20, 1901 (Me. 1901)
- City of Indianapolis v. Ritzinger (Ind. Ct. App. 1900)
- Colton v. City of Montpelier (Vt. 1899)
- State Board of Tax Commissioners v. Holliday (Ind. 1898)
- McCurtain v. Grady (Court Of Appeals Of Indian Territory 1896)
- New England Trout & Salmon Club v. Mather (Vt. 1895)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff, having an execution upon a judg
By a law of the colony of Massachusetts, passed as early as the year 1636,
Of these statutes a practical construction early and generally ootained that in the power to dispose of lands was included a power to sell and convey the common lands. Large and valuable estates are held in various parts of the commonwealth, the titles to which depend on this construction. Were the Court [ * 478 ] * now to decide that this construction is not to be supported, very great mischief would follow. And although, if it were now res integra, it might be very difficult to maintain such a construction, yet at this day the argumentum ab incorwenienti applies with great weight. We cannot shake a principle which in practice has so long and so extensively prevailed. If the practice originated in error, yet the error is now so common that it must have the force of law. The legal ground on which this provision is now supported is, that long and continued usage furnishes a contemporaneous construction, which must prevail over the mere technical import of the words. The result is, that there can be no new trial.
Judgment according to verdict.
2 Mass. Laws, App. 966.
Ibid. 995.
Packard vs. Richardson & Al. 17 Mass. Rep. 144.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.