Symonds v. Kimball
Symonds v. Kimball
Opinion of the Court
The whole purpose of the interlocutory judgment that partition be made, was fully answered by the agreeme it of the parties. Though upon a writ of partition at the common law, each parcener has his purparty assigned, yet it is sufficient upon a petition under our statute that the petitioner have his share set off to him. In many cases more is impossible, as the petitioner is entitled to partition, though his co-tenants are unknown. The commissioners returned that they gave seasonable notice, and the Court accepted their return. It is true the parties had no day in Court at that time to plead; but they might have made this, or any other objection
The judgment was reversed as to the awarding of costs, and i (firmed as to the rest.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Calvin Symonds, in Error, versus Reuben Kimball
- Status
- Published