Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1808

Wightman v. Hastings

Wightman v. Hastings
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Decided March 15, 1808
4 Mass. 244
Wightman v. Hastings

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

(absente Parsons, C. J.) The words of the statute are too clear to leave a doubt. It is absurd to say that the parties may by their agreement evade a positive and very wholesome pro vision of a statute. The case is clearly within the provision, and to decide otherwise would be to make law, not to explain and administer it. The plaintiff is entitled to his costs before the appeal and the defendant is entitled to his costs since the appeal.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.