Short v. Pratt
Cases that cite this one
19 later published cases cite this decision.
- Ex parte Jennings (New York Supreme Court 1826)
- Peterson v. Loring (Me. 1820)
- Estate of John W. Gilbert (Me. 2017)
- Estate of Gilbert (Me. 2017)
- Estate of Gilbert (Me. 2017)
- Estate of Gilbert (Me. 2017)
- Doherty v. Doherty (Mass. 1889)
- Denison v. Portland Co. (Me. 1872)
- Sperry v. Ricker (Mass. 1862)
- Joslyn v. County Commissioners of Franklin (Mass. 1860)
- McCrary v. Harrison (Ala. 1860)
- Hoffman v. Hoffman (N.J. 1857)
- Shaw v. Norfolk County Railroad (Mass. 1855)
- Carpenter v. Wood (Mass. 1840)
- Inhabitants of Cumberland v. Inhabitants of North-Yarmouth (Me. 1827)
- Moffitt v. Jaquins (Mass. 1824)
- Bacon v. Ward (Mass. 1813)
- Jones v. Hacker (Mass. 1809)
- Couch v. Davis (Superior Court of New Hampshire 1806)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The statute under which these proceedings
But it does not appear on this record, that all the referees heard the parties ; and this is error, for which the judgment ought to be reversed. — If all had heard the parties, two might have made a report against the assent of the third. But his opinion [ * 498 ] and arguments might have had an * influence on the judgments of the others, and have produced a different report, although he might finally have dissented.
.It is indispensable in the proceedings under this statute, that all the referees should hear the parties, on the matters submitted ; and this fact should appear on the record. It does not appear On this record ; and for this cause the judgment must be reversed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.