Willington v. Gale
Cases that cite this one
28 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Poignard v. Smith (Mass. 1828)
- Cleve v. . Adams (N.C. 1942)
- Stevens v. . Turlington (N.C. 1923)
- Stevens v. Turlington (N.C. 1923)
- Hawes v. Nason (Me. 1913)
- Van Dyke v. Grand Trunk Railway Co. (Vt. 1911)
- Collamore v. Collamore (Mass. 1893)
- Cowles v. Dickinson (Mass. 1886)
- McMahon v. Russell (Fla. 1880)
- Dolliver v. St. Joseph Fire & Marine Insurance (Mass. 1880)
- White v. Rittenmyer (Iowa 1870)
- Johnson v. Harmon (Iowa 1865)
- Pace v. Chadderdon (Minn. 1860)
- Orr v. Hadley (N.H. 1858)
- Hall v. Savill (Iowa 1851)
- Abbott v. Sturtevant (Me. 1849)
- Gardner's Adm'r v. Morrison (Ala. 1847)
- White v. Whitney (Mass. 1841)
- Upham v. Bradley (Me. 1840)
- Ellison v. Daniels (Superior Court of New Hampshire 1840)
- Mayo v. Fletcher (Mass. 1833)
- Gibson v. Seymour (Vt. 1831)
- Southerin v. Mendum (Superior Court of New Hampshire 1831)
- Clark v. Wentworth (Me. 1830)
- Powell v. Monson & Brimfield Manuf'g Co. (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts 1824)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The mortgagor, after his mortgage, still continues the owner of the land, and seised of it against all persons but the mortgagee, or those who claim under him ; and he has therefore a right to convey the estate mortgaged, defeasible only by the mortgagee, or some person having his right; and if he conveys, thus having a right to convey, by deed executed, acknowledged, and registered, the purchaser shall be deemed actually seised, without entry or livery of seisin.
The statute of 1798, c. 77, which makes rights in equity, of redeeming real estate mortgaged, liable to be seized and sold on execution, provides that the sheriff’s deed shall convey the debtor’s right in equity to the purchaser, his heirs and assigns, in the same manner as the debtor had executed the deed.
[Tuttle vs. Brown, 14 Pick. 514. — Ed.]
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.