Inhabitants of Groton v. Inhabitants of Shirley
Cases that cite this one
12 later published cases cite this decision.
- Inhabitants of Hallowell v. Inhabitants of Bowdoinham (Me. 1820)
- Barnstead v. Alton (N.H. 1855)
- Inhabitants of Ripley v. Inhabitants of Levant (Me. 1856)
- Inhab'ts of Starks v. Inhab'ts of New Sharon (Me. 1855)
- Town of Westfield v. Town of Coventry (Vt. 1899)
- Inhabitants of Livermore v. Inhabitants of Phillips (Me. 1853)
- Inhabitants of Somerset v. Inhabitants of Rehoboth (Mass. 1850)
- Inhabitants of Fayette v. Inhabitants of Hebron (Me. 1842)
- Inhabt's of New Portland v. Inabt's of Rumford (Me. 1836)
- Town of Mason v. Town of Alexandria (Superior Court of New Hampshire 1825)
- Inhabitants of Fitchburg v. Inhabitants of Westminster (Mass. 1822)
- Inhabitants of Westport v. Inhabitants of Dartmouth (Mass. 1813)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The action being continued nisi, the opinion of the Court was delivered at the following November term in Suffolk, by
It is settled, that when a new town is made out of parcels of two or more towns, including the inhabitants living on the parcels, all the inhabitants, having settlements in the towns in which they dwelt, acquire a settlement in the new town by the act of incorporation. But the defendants’ counsel have endeavored to distinguish from this case the case where a part of an existing town is detached, and annexed to another existing town.
We are not satisfied that there is any ground for the distinction which is attempted. Upon the annexation of Stow-leg to Shirley, the inhabitants of Shirley were entitled, not only to the benefit of all the lands in the leg, but also to all the wealth, property, and personal services of the inhabitants, towards the discharge of the municipal duties of the town of Shirley ; of all which Stow by the annexation has been deprived. It would then be unreasonable to leave to Stow the burden of maintaining these inhabitants, when they should
Let judgment be entered on the verdict.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.