Carey v. Rawson
Cases that cite this one
8 later published cases cite this decision.
- Levenson v. Feuer (Mass. App. Ct. 2004)
- Collyer v. Davis (Neb. 1904)
- Osborn v. Phelps (Conn. 1848)
- Nugent v. Riley (Mass. 1840)
- Perry v. Holden (Mass. 1839)
- Trull v. Skinner (Mass. 1835)
- Bodwell v. Webster (Mass. 1832)
- Erskine v. Townsend (Mass. 1807)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
without hesitation, decided that the two deeds must be treated as parts of one transaction, and together constituted a mortgage ; and that the tenant, having confessed the forfeiture, should be heard in chancery.
[Flagg vs. Mann, 2 Sumn. 486.— Van Buren vs..Olmstead, 5 Paige, 9. — James vs. Johnson, 6 Johns. Ch. 417. — 2 Cow. 246.— Day vs. Dunham, 2 Johns. Ch. 289. — 15 Johns. 555. — Hicks vs. Hicks, 5 Gill & Johns. 76. — Edrington vs. Harper, 3 J. J. Marsh. 356. — Harrison & Al. vs. The Trustees of Phillips Academy, 12 Mass. 456. — Rice vs. Rice, 4 Pick. 349.—Newhall vs. Burt & Al. 7 Pick. 157.— Sed vide Flagg vs. Mann, 11 Pick. 475. — Bodwell vs. Webster, 13 Pick. 411. — Ed.]
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.