Hodges v. Hodges
Cases that cite this one
11 later published cases cite this decision.
- Louison v. Fischman (Mass. 1960)
- Jones v. . Welwood (N.Y. 1877)
- King v. Savory (Mass. 1851)
- King v. Savory (Mass. 1851)
- Slocum v. Damon (Wis. 1845)
- Elliott v. Quimby (Superior Court of New Hampshire 1842)
- Inhabitants of North Yarmouth v. Inhabitants of Cumberland (Me. 1829)
- Livermore v. Herschell (Mass. 1825)
- Livermore v. Herschell (Mass. 1825)
- Kleine v. Catara (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts 1814)
- Webster v. Lee (Mass. 1809)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Non constat that the defendant’s account was ever laid before the referees. If it was not, they could not arbitrate upon it. The agreement of the parties, evidenced * by the rule of the Court, was then so far not executed; and notwithstanding the general report of the referees, the defendant, if not otherwise precluded, may yet have his action upon the account filed by him, but on which the referees have not awarded. The judgment of the Common Pleas is affirmed, with costs for the defendant in error.
Vide Webster vs. Lee, 5 Mass. Rep. 934.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.