Smith v. Whiting
Cases that cite this one
13 later published cases cite this decision.
- Estate of Barrett (California Superior Court, San Francisco County 1899)
- Dewey v. Metropolitan Life Insurance (Mass. 1926)
- Allen v. Corn Exchange Bank (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1903)
- James (Massachusetts Land Court 1903)
- Clark v. Gramling (Ark. 1891)
- MacKay v. Saint Mary's Church (R.I. 1885)
- Smith v. Boyer (New York Supreme Court 1871)
- Skinner v. Bedell's Adm'r (Ala. 1858)
- Gayle v. Ennis (Tex. 1846)
- Bogert v. Hertell (N.Y. 1842)
- Mcintire v. McLaurin (Tenn. 1840)
- Mcintire v. McLaurin (Tenn. 1840)
- Miller v. Bledsoe (Ill. 1838)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
observed that, having to ked into the cases cited in the argument, they were satisfied that the defendant must prevail. The question is, whether one of two executors is competent to transfer, by endorsement, a negotiable promissory note made to the two in their character of executors. The promisees, not being copartners, had each but a moiety. One, therefore, could not assign the whole. Nor was it competent for him to assign his moiety,
Declaration adjudged had
[Mangram vs Sirurus, 1 Car L. R. 547. — Ed.]
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.