Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1813

Fish v. Dana

Fish v. Dana
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Decided March 15, 1813
10 Mass. 46

Counsel

Parsons for the plaintiff., Dana pro se.

Fish v. Dana

Opinion of the Court

Curia.

The rejoinder is immaterial. The defendant was to take his own time to discharge the mortgage and pay the notes mentioned. But he was, in all events, to indemnify the plaintiff, lie has failed so to do; and the plaintiff is entitled to judgment.

ADDITIONAL NOTE.

[See, as to bonds of indemnity, Negrus, 7 Wend. 499. — Chace vs. Hinman, 8 Wend, 452. —F. H.]

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.