Commonwealth v. Neal
Cases that cite this one
8 later published cases cite this decision.
- State v. . Williams (N.C. 1871)
- Wagener v. Bill (New York Supreme Court 1855)
- State v. Patton (Mo. 1941)
- State v. Martini (N.J. 1910)
- Gill v. State (W. Va. 1894)
- State v. Ma Foo (Mo. 1892)
- Luster v. State (Fla. 1887)
- Commonwealth v. Wood (Mass. 1867)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The general doctrine is, that a feme covert incurs no legal guilt by the commission of civil offences, by the coercion of her husband, or even when in his presence. To this general rule, there are certain exceptions, as of crimes forbidden by the law of nature, which are mala in fe, and some where the wife may be presumed the principal agent. The case at bar is not within the exceptions, and Elizabeth Neal is not guilty, and must therefore be discharged,
[A married woman, living apart from her husband, may be indicted alone, and pun ished, for keeping a house of ill fame.— Com. vs. Lewis, 1 Metc. 181. — F. H.]
[In Sikes vs. Johnson M., (16 Mass. Rep. 389,) it was held, that a feme covert
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.